PaTriCKLiM Diary

One day , jaw saw a banner hanging in front of cassette outlet in alamanda which reads :"BIG SALE!, LATEST TOO PHAT"S ALBUM IS FOR GRAB WITH 50% DISCOUNT ! LIMITED STOCK !HURRY !"After reading it jaw immediately run into the outlet and said she want the album at the said discount price . unfortunately the shop owner said the cassette is now sold at normal price .Can jaw sue the shop owner for breach of contract ?

In this case Jaw cannot sue the shop owner for breach of contract . Section 2 (a) of the contracts Act 1950 states that when one person signifies to another , his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything , with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to the act or abstinence , he said to make a proposal . An offer is different from an advertisement .

In majumder v. attorney -general of Sarawak , the federal court held that an advertisement in the news paper for the post of a doctor was an invitation to treat .

Therefore , applying the above principles , the advertisement by cassette outlet is not an offer to contract but is a mere invitation to treat .

Wei and Chong went supermarket one day to buy some glossary . In the supermarket Wei looked at the good which on display and decided to purchase 3 bottles face creams which were on offer . She took the bottles to counter and paid for it .As they leaving the supermarket , the cashier come up and told them they have to return the good . In this case whether a not Wei return the bottles to cashier ?

For my own opinion , Wei have the right not return the good to cashier. According to contract act 1950. In this situation the contract is binding . This legal principal is clearly illustrated in "pharmaceutical society of great britian Vs boots cash chemist Ltd " on the beginning , Wei looked at the good display on is only the invitation to treat , when Wei decided to buy the face cream . The contract is not yet make between Wei and cashier .This situation change when Wei took the bottles to counter and she paid for them, then only the  contract is make .

In this case , cashier have no right to took back the face creams from Wei . In order for the face creams to get back from Wei , supermarket might offer Wei good compensation in order to get back face creams from Wei.

Marital Rape means husband rape wife . Traditional it consider no legally possible for the husband to rape wife unless the "wife " is minor or under age . It believe that marriage is a consent to sexual intercourse and cannot be revoked by any party. So marriage license is simply call "license to RAPE " .In fact Marital Rape is not recognize in Malaysia Law . According  Muslim , Quran say that wife duty is to submit to the husband sexual need and therefore no such thing as marital rape in Malaysia law .

Many Malaysia doubt that ISA in is a necessary evil? whether a not ISA Malaysia Should be Abolish? The Internal Security Act 1960 (ISA) ( Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri) is a preventive detention law in force in Malaysia . This  legislation was enacted after Malaysia gained independence from Britain in 1957. The ISA allows for detention without trial or criminal charges under limited, legally defined circumstances.(source from Wikipedia) . ISA is apply not just in Malaysia but in many other foreign county  and it work well.

Supposedly ISA is an act to protect country from terrorist attack ,but now ISA become a tool to solve political problem .Many people undertake by ISA are student, joneallist , news reporter , leader of opposition party but not terrorist. So STOP FOOLED  that don't to repeal ISA because want to protect you and me .